Van Tharp Article

Reproduced with thanks to Dr. Van Tharp – www.vantharp.com

This is a FREE newsletter that Van Tharp.com produces to subscribers, often there are articles that are extremely educational to traders/Investors and that is when I repost them.

See below and enjoy.

 

Articlefrank

An Interview with Frank Eaves:

Hit in the Head with a Marble Bag

Conducted by RJ Hixson

View              On-line

Last week, one of Van’s  research assistants, Frank Eaves, sent an interesting email  to Van and a few of the staff here.   In his note, Frank quoted this selection from Volume 5 of the Peak Performance  Home Study Course:

“Most people cannot, and do not, trade  with Bill’s simple strategy because it is not an efficient decision making  strategy. It neither generates options nor effectively evaluates them. But,  because your trading system should make decisions for you, it is an excellent  action strategy.”

In a subsequent conversation, Frank related how he had realized a number  of insights from those few sentences.  He explained his insights in plain  terms and his ideas seemed to hold a lot of potential value for our  clients.  I asked Frank if he’d be willing to be interviewed for an  article.  He agreed and here’s how it went:

First, that passage  mentions Bill’s strategy.  Who is Bill  and what is his strategy?

Van was talking about two traders.  One, named Jack, looked at a chart,  considered which directions price might go and considered what could go wrong  with each scenario.  The other trader, Bill,  used a simple mental strategy to make a trade.   He would see the pattern, recognize it, feel good about it, and place  the order.

Why isn’t Bill’s  strategy an effective decision making strategy? 

He’s not thinking about all of the options, what could  happen, or what the best choice is at this point.  His process is more automatic.

So that’s why it’s an  excellent action strategy?

Yes, exactly.  Bill’s  not there to consider all of the options — he’s there to follow his system’s  rules.

Your email made it sound  like some idea in that quote really hit you.   What was so remarkable?

Bill’s process makes the key connection between a mental strategy and a  trading system. Your trading system has a set of rules for you to follow that generate  an R-multiple distribution.  It’s the  system’s job to make decisions, not the trader’s. This is a very  big piece of the puzzle to being a successful trader and it really brings me  back to the foundation of successful trading — myself.

What do you mean by that?

It’s all psychology.  If you don’t  follow Bill’s strategy, you can’t execute a system to get a valid R multiple  distribution for it.  Without a valid R  multiple distribution, you don’t have a meaningful marble bag to craft position  sizing strategies to meet your objectives. Without being able to craft  effective position sizing strategies, you can’t meet your objectives.  This leads to a cycle of fail, trigger,  operate, test, exit, fail, then start over, which probably means looking for a  new system.  It can become an endless  loop and it’s a rat race — you are looking externally for what’s wrong when  really it’s all inside — your psychology.

What do you mean by a “meaningful  marble bag”? 

Van uses a bag of marbles at his workshops to represent a trading  system.  The marbles in the bag have  different colors which represent different R multiple trade results.  Pulling out multiple marbles from the bag is  just like executing trades — it gets you a set of R multiple results.  The bag makes a great metaphor for understanding  how to look at a system.  Viewing your  system as a marble bag simplifies trading so you can use Bill’s mental strategy  and forget about being “right” or worry about losing on any given trade.  The marble bag brings a trading system into  the domain of statistics and probability and mathematics.  Once you get to that domain, making trades has  a lot less emotional charge.  2+2=4 does  not have a lot of charge, it just is, and that’s how you should look at your  system.

You think traders don’t view their  system this way?

A lot of people seem to believe that the trading system is  the most important factor in trading success. That’s where  the Holy Grail analogy comes from, but that really shows a lack of awareness  that the system is just a set of beliefs.  It’s a way to help you generate  a set of results consistent with a particular set of rules.  How often  though do traders bend the rules when they trade a system?  You may get  “good” results from bending the rules but those results are not the results of  the system, they are something else. Actually, that’s a different marble bag than the system’s marble bag.

Why do you think following a system’s  rules can be so hard to do?

There are probably lots of reasons but let me just talk about following  the rules for a new system.  When you trade a system that’s  new for you, you have to  adopt the beliefs behind the system and they may not match yours.  It’s  kind of like clothes.  You are comfortable in your clothes.  If you  come to a technical workshop to learn a system, though, you have to take your  clothes off and try on the clothes of the trader who teaches the system.   Those clothes may or may not “fit” you — figuratively speaking.  If,  however, you keep your clothes on and try to put the instructor’s clothes over  yours for whatever reason, you are definitely going to be uncomfortable.   Which items will you remove first in that case? Not your clothes, you’ve been  wearing them a long time and they are comfortable.  So when trading that new system, you’ll do what feels  comfortable which probably means doing something other than “wearing  uncomfortable clothes”  or following uncomfortable rules.

Systems are just beliefs; they aren’t magic.   Sometimes at our technical workshops, though, I have heard people ask,  “Am I allowed do ‘this’ instead of ‘that’?” as if “this” would ruin the magic.  Again, there is no magic.  Adjusting the rules on a positive expectancy  system to match your beliefs is going to happen.  Those adjustments may keep it profitable or  turn it into a negative expectancy system.   Once you know that, however, you can identify specific beliefs, choose  to let go of them and adopt new ones.

I have seen some traders whose beliefs match  closely with the  instructor’s and they are able to trade a system well with very few  modifications.  Nearly everyone, however,  needs to make some modifications to the system’s rules based on their own  beliefs.  Sometimes these modifications  work but other times, they generate a negative expectancy.  Sometimes people believe that the poor  performance comes from a faulty system, but really, it can come down to a new set of clothes  that didn’t fit.  A system is 100%  beliefs so if someone else’s beliefs don’t work for you, figure out ways to use  your beliefs to develop a system.  Again — all psychology.

Then what advice do you give people about systems?

I encourage people to find any positive expectancy system with a decent SQN  score, use the position  sizing game to enter a trading system’s R multiple distribution, and trade  that — a lot.  Once you have your marble bag, you can see how position sizing strategies are what truly help  you meet your objectives — not the trading system.  Try risking 1% of equity, try more, try less,  try the other strategies discussed in The  Definitive Guide to Position Sizing Strategies, like market’s money.  Get a feel for how the position sizing  strategy works together with the system results and what one will work best for you.  That said, the limitations of multiple open  positions and portfolio heat still matter.   I think you could use multiple bags to overcome this limitation of a single marble bag simulation, but regardless, the  gains from understanding the idea far outweigh the limitations.

After someone understands the marble bag idea and how position sizing strategies really work, following Bill’s strategy comes a  lot easier.  And by the way, Bill’s automatic strategy also applies to  positions sizing strategies.

How so?

Your position sizing strategy is the engine that will take you where you  want to go and helps you avoid where you don’t want to go.  Once you set it though, executing it needs to be a matter of following its rules. Say you created a position sizing strategy  for a system that helps you meet your objectives.  The strategy requires you to take the profit from your last trade and risk it on your next trade.  If you are unable to follow Bill’s model with  the risk amount, however, then you aren’t executing your position sizing  strategy.  The system rules, the marble  bag results, your objectives, the position sizing strategy — they all work  together, but here, none of that matters.   So where are you going?  What are  you doing?

How about you, what are you doing?                                 I’m trying to increase my awareness of my mental processes through the Peak  Performance Home Study, Van’s workshops and a lot of self-study.  I want to be able to follow Bill’s model  and trade really well.  In that process, I keep seeing   different ways that trading always comes back to psychology.

Great.  Thank you very much and good luck.

 

About Frank: Frank Eaves is one of the research assistants for the Van Tharp Institute and has been with the company for about two years. He is a key contributor to software development initiatives and has a current focus on our newest trading simulator. He prides himself in keeping the rest of the office on its toes with his frank and sarcastic sense of humor

Advertisements
Leave a comment

Comment Here:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: